Countries should produce food for all their Population IELTS Essay
Many people believe that countries should produce food for all their population eats and import food as little as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words.
Real IELTS Exam Question, Reported On:
|India||14th May 2022|
Countries should try to produce food for all their Population IELTS Essay
It is believed that nations should grow crops themselves to feed their residents, and import should be reduced to a large extent. This essay agrees with this statement because this initiative will make food items cheaper and improve the financial status of farmers.
Firstly, the food items grown in the nation will be much more affordable for its citizens. This is because grains produced in the nation do not need to pay the international transportation cost and other international charges. As a result, the price of locally grown food will much lower. For example, in South-east nations, they import much of their wheat and rice from other nations and thus the cost of these food grains is quite higher in these nations as compared to other parts of the world. ieltsxpress
Secondly, when governments will push their residents to produce more grains for domestic consumption, it is more likely that the income of local farmers will increase. This is because all crops that they grow will be sold in the local food markets either purchased by the government agencies or private companies. This will enable farmers to earn a good amount of money. To illustrate, in India, the government procures grains from farmers at a minimum support price and thus this has enabled farmers to have an assured income for their work and have a decent lifestyle.
In conclusion, domestically grown food products will result in lowering the prices of food items and it will raise the economic status of the farming community.
IELTS Essay on Food and Population
It is commonly suggested that food grown by the nations should satisfy the needs of all their citizens and imports must be curbed as much as possible. I completely agree with this point of view as this will help countries in saving money and creating many opportunities for the residents.
One of the biggest benefits of producing food in-house is that it can financially favor the governments. Becoming self-sufficient in food production and minimizing imports makes the country less dependent on others and at the same it benefits local producers. This will also give an upper hand in trade related decisions with other nations. Moreover, food grown in the country will have lower base prices as they become a regular item in people’s diet. For example, 30 years ago, India was totally dependent on foreign countries for wheat and then wheat prices were high. However, now the country produces enough wheat for its people and prices have fallen by 50%. Thus, domestic production of foods benefits national economies.
Additionally, the idea of growing food to fulfill the country’s demand will create many opportunities for their people to grow. This will create higher employment in this sector and will motivate the researchers to develop new technologies. For instance, the state of Punjab created 30% more jobs for its residents since the time it started to lead the nation in the production of wheat. Furthermore, the state government was able to allocate more resources to the research and development making wheat much more affordable to the people of India.
In conclusion, the idea of growing food that can fulfil the need of the country and curtailing imports is entirely justified. This will not only make the country financially strong but also generate more employment opportunities employment and elevate its technological capacities in the long run.
Countries should try to produce food for all their Population IELTS Essay
There exists an opinion that each country should ensure its food security as per the food demands of its population rather than relying heavily on other countries. I too think the same way, despite some strong exceptions.
The primary reason for my view is because of the fact that many countries across the world face food shortage, though they are capable to be independent in case of meeting the food demands. This might be due to changing focus of development from agricultural sector to other sectors like tourism and infrastructure. Admitting the fact that development is needed in all the sectors, I think a country should never deviate its focus from food produce, as it is one of the basic needs of mankind.
In many countries, hectares of agricultural lands are converted to either residential or industrial areas, and they depend heavily on food imports. The most undesirable situation might arise when there occurs a shortage in these imports due to any unforeseen events like natural calamities or war. In such a case, the citizens of the dependent countries might suffer severe food shortage or even famine. In order to avoid such incidences, it is better to produce and store enough food items a country’s population demands.
However, there are countries, where extreme climatic conditions are present. For example, it is difficult to meet the food demands of middle east countries, as the area suitable for agriculture is too less, compared to other countries. The situation is similar in case of countries, where frequent floods and droughts occur. The modern technology is not yet fully developed to solve these issues.
In conclusion, even though adverse conditions hampers the food production process in certain countries, i think a country should ensure minimum food imports by promoting cultivation of edible food products, whenever and wherever possible.
IELTS Writing Task 2 on Food
Ensuring food adequacy for the entire population has been a major concern for nations throughout the centuries. Some people believe that the government should focus on producing all kinds of food while importing as little as possible to ensure food sufficiency. I firmly believe that producing many kinds of food is an inevitable effort in terms of ensuring the nation’s food security.
Firstly, the more a country relies on imported food, the more food crisis it faces. Food import includes transportation costs, taxation and other charges that eventually increase the food price. To tackle this problem, a government should allocate more budgets to improve national production by maximising the collaboration of research centres with farmers. Related university courses and diploma programmes can create more talented individuals who would be involved in domestic food production. Furthermore, by mass production of all kinds of food items, a country can prepare for the rainy days.
Secondly, by focusing on farming, irrigation and planting, a government can decrease unemployment problems. For example, in Indonesia, the farming sector creates the highest percentage of jobs. More than 50 per cent of Indonesians are directly or indirectly depends on the agriculture sector.
Finally, imported food does not have the same quality and freshness as locally produced food and crops. If food is imported from a long distance, the food value degrades and in some cases, toxic chemicals are used to preserve the imported food. Thus the local production of foods would ensure better food quality and sound health of citizens.
In conclusion, preventing the food crisis, ensuring better food quality and decreasing unemployment could be achieved if a country becomes self-sufficient in its food production. It is expected that countries would emphasize their domestic food production as it gives many competitive advantages over importing.
IELTS Writing Task 2 on Food for Population
Every country wants to reduce its dependency on imports while maximising its exports including items such as food and crops. However, not all countries have the same geographic location, weather condition, technology and suitable lands to produce each type of crop the citizens need. This is why a country should focus more on its overall economic growth rather than using manpower and budget to become self-reliant on food.
To commence with, soil, weather condition, available lands, technology and demographics of a county determine what crops, vegetables and fruits it can produce. Not all countries have the same geographical features and manpower, and thus, it is obvious that the country needs to import some of the items. In many cases, this is rather advantageous than producing or growing crops and then harvesting the grains. For instance, it is impossible for an Arab country to produce all types of foods due to its weather condition. If they focus on growing these food items and engage their manpower to do that, their economic growth would be hindered.
Moreover, a country like Germany and China can focus on manufacturing and industrial innovation while import food from other countries. The ultimate outcome is more beneficial for them. However, this might not be the case for a country that solely depends on the agriculture sector and when a majority of its population are already dependant on it. They can focus on improving their productions, but this model is not suitable for industrial countries. ieltsxpress
To conclude, I believe that free trade and globalisation have made the world a global village. And with the speedy transportation system, food import cost has already declined. Since fulfilling the mass people’s diverse needs for various kinds of food is not feasible for a country, it should focus on its true potential rather than allocating budget and manpower to become self-dependent on food.
IELTS Essay on Food
Some of the food in every country today produced miles away from where it is sold and consumed. This trend requires significant amount of fuel for transportation and storage, resulting to environmental pollution generated from bulk shipping. I strongly agree that each country should source food locally and control food importations.
It is apparent that locally produced food does not need to be transported from which countries it was grown to someone’s dinner table. In this particular arrangement, governments are not putting at risk the health of its people by importing foods from far distance huge factory farms. Firstly, imported foodstuffs contains more harmful preservatives and hazardous chemicals added on perishable crops in order to keep it fresh during transit. Secondly, the economic impact matter most when someone buy a locally produced foods. The farmers from that locality will takes homes the total amount and tend to spend for the salary of local workers. As a result, consumer spending will increase in that community, resulting to a robust economic activities in that area.
Contrastingly, there are several reasons why governments importing foods from other countries, one of which is to give its citizen more variety to choice from. To give you an example, every country has different climate and not all sorts of fruits and vegetables grown throughout the year. Because of imported foods, people from dry places can have fresh oranges, bananas, lettuce or potatoes anytime they want. However, government must impose stiffer charges on importation of food which is abundant in that locality. The Philippines, for instance, this country is blessed with vast rice plains and rainfalls and still importing rice from neighboring countries. The government should spend on research and development on how to expand rice plantation coverage to support the growing demand of rice consumption and not to rely heavily on importations.
In conclusion, when foods are sourced locally there are tendency that foods contain no preservative and pesticide since these will only be sold in a nearby places. In addition, governments should put off or control importation of foods that can be grown or raised in their respective country to strengthens local economy.