It is Impossible to help all people Essay – IELTS Discussion Essay
It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience. You should write at least 250 words.
This essay was asked on 9 October 2021 India Question Answers
It is impossible to help all people IELTS Essay – Model Answer 1
Many today have suggested that governments should prioritise supporting their own citizenry over offering foreign aid. I strongly agree with this statement as international interventions often do more harm than good and governments have greater control concerning domestic assistance.
Firstly, foreign aid is notoriously difficult to manage. The majority of countries helped by foreign aid either end up exploiting the charity or become overly dependent. A good example of this would be the aid sent to many African nations during times of civil turmoil. Certain corrupt governments would often leverage the aid, whether it be food supplies or financial support, to maintain their autocratic position. Even in the rare cases where aid reaches its intended targets without interference from governments or non-governmental organisations, there is a strong likelihood of establishing a dependence. Individuals generally profit more long-term from developing characteristics related to self-reliance rather than becoming subservient in a dependent relationship.
Moreover, governments are able to affect greater change over their own populace. There are many different tactics that governments can choose ranging from funding a comprehensive social welfare net to allowing individuals to keep more of their tax dollars and contribute to the economy. A standout example of this would be in China where the government has tremendous sway over both public and private entities. This ensures that their assistance is not misused and that it supports truly vulnerable segments of the population. Their oversight and knowledge of their own country translate to a more efficient allocation of resources and this applies generally to governments globally.
In conclusion, there is little support for the efficacy of foreign aid and governments can intervene most effectively in their own nations. Therefore, foreign aid should be limited to times of extreme crisis.
Individuals and countries cannot help everyone who needs help in the world IELTS Essay – Model Answer 2
The global scenario is such that on one hand the world is becoming more and more developed and linked due to increase in trade and movement of people between countries. However, billions of people still live in poverty and are in need of help. This essay will look at the arguments for and against helping poor countries.
If we look at reasons for helping poor countries, the first reason can be a humanitarian one. It can be said it is the social duty of industrialized nations to help people in countries who are suffering from famine, drought, war, or disease. Interestingly, many rich countries also have a political or diplomatic agenda behind donating money. They want to maintain a relationship of dependency with the recipient, or simply to influence the government and direction of the country. But the fact is that the developed nations are much less than the nations needing help. The question here arises up to what extent a poor country can be helped.
Many experts opine that aid is not necessarily the best way to help a country. Many a time, billions of dollars of aid often don’t reach the needy, getting seeped off into corrupt governments and inefficient administrations. Also, many foreign aid projects are unsuitable for the target country. There are many examples in economic magazines and newspapers of aid-funded projects in Africa that failed miserably. This kind of situation not only proves to be a setback for the poor countries but also is a blow to the economies of the rich ones.
The statement that it is impossible to help everyone does seem true. However, it is our duty to try and make a difference. There are many other ways in which we can help poor countries. Flexing trade restrictions allowing countries can sell their goods is one way. There is a dire need for basic necessities in such countries, so awareness and facilities for say water, sanitation, hygiene and such should be deployed.
In closing I’d say, even though the richer countries seem prosperous, there is not enough money in the world for everyone. Everybody, rich or poor, needs to make do with what they have, and try to expand the resources appropriately.
Government should only focus on people of their own country Essay – Model Answer 3
The role of one government to support citizens of other countries has been a major topic of concern in today’s society. From my perspective, this practice is feasible, and there are compelling reasons why governments should help people in the global community rather than only focusing on the citizens of their own countries.
In this context of globalisation and international integration, the provision of assistance for people of all countries in the world is not an impossible task anymore. One explanation for this is that modern means of transport have transformed the way that international assistance could be given, and assistance could reach even the most remote places on Earth. For example, thousands of victims of a deadly earthquake in a mountainous city in Nepal were rescued by US and German military helicopters in 2014. One further explanation is that thanks to international banking, the international community could offer a helping hand to any country where the financial system is on the verge of collapse. An excellent example of this is that the saving money of millions of taxpayers and pensioners in Greece was saved by a timely act of the European Commission of injecting a huge amount of bailout money into Greek banks in 2009.
I strongly believe any government must assume the responsibility of helping citizens in other countries. This is mainly because assisting inhabitants in other countries, to some extent, is synonymous with assisting people in the home country. In 2014, hundreds of US and UK doctors and nurses were sent to African countries to cope with the outbreak of Ebola, a dreadful plague, which had killed many thousands by that time. This action prevented the plague from further spreading to other nations, including the US and the UK themselves, considering that there was a free movement of people between countries and there were millions of African migrant workers in the US and the UK at that time. Besides, the act of supporting people all around the world may promote a sense of humanity, which is essential to the sustainable development of the world, because humanity is the foundation of peace and stability.
To conclude, governments must assist citizens of other countries for a clear reason that this feasible act could simultaneously enhance a global sense of humanity and assure their own nationals of a proper living environment.
It is impossible to help all people in the world IELTS Essay – Model Answer
Some people believe that we should not help people in other countries as long as there are problems in our own society. I disagree with this view because I believe that we should try to help as many people as possible.
On the one hand, I accept that it is important to help our neighbours and fellow citizens. In most communities, there are people who are impoverished or disadvantaged in some way. It is possible to find homeless people, for example, in even the wealthiest of cities, and for those who are concerned about this problem, there are usually opportunities to volunteer time or give money to support these people. In the UK, people can help in a variety of ways, from donating clothing to serving free food in a soup kitchen. As the problems are on our doorstep, and there are obvious ways to help, I can understand why some people feel that we should prioritise local charity.
At the same time, I believe that we have an obligation to help those who live beyond our national borders. In some countries, the problems that people face are much more serious than those in our own communities, and it is often even easier to help. For example, when children are dying from curable diseases in African countries, governments and individuals in richer countries can save lives simply by paying for vaccines that already exist. A small donation to an international charity might have a much greater impact than helping in our local area.
In conclusion, it is true that we cannot help everyone, but in my opinion, national boundaries should not stop us from helping those who are in need.
It is impossible to help all people IELTS Writing Task 2 – Model Answer
It is argued that supporting masses all over the world, who really need help, is not possible for governments, so the regime should focus on indigenous people of their own native land. I agree with this statement, aa it is the prime responsibility of any government to assist it’s a citizen first then others.
First and foremost, native people pay a tax to the government of their country, and they help in generating income. Thus their contribution to the development of a country is immense. Moreover, it is a moral obligation for the rulers who rule the country to provide a healthy living standard to its countrymen. So, the upliftment of a nation’s people is an indispensable task for the government. For instance, if developing countries support their people to raise their living conditions like creating employment, free education, reservation for downtrodden in various sectors, then people will flourish, and they can give an utmost contribution in making their country stand on foot and also in the line of developed nations. Afterward, that country can assist a lot of other nations in many ways.
In addition, it is impossible for a single nation to assist people all over the world due to the scarcity of funds. It is a shared responsibility. So, every government is liable to their masses in order to create harmony in the country and for shaping their country in a new world. Besides, there is no use in helping other people by depriving one’s people and making them handicapped to lead a life full of miseries. Thus people will experience trial and tribulations. So, people must be assisted by their own government.
In conclusion, serving people worldwide in supporting them in times of difficulty is impossible. It is because every government has its own responsibilities for its citizens. If any government fails to do so, then there will be anarchy in a nation, and a feeling of hatred will develop in the minds of people.
Impossible to help all people, Government should focus on their own people – Model Answer
Past few decades, due to globalization, migrating to other places hs been rose and become common. Some people believe that yielding aid to other countries is not possible for the bureaucrats; their priority should have to own the country first. I strongly agree with the given notion my inclination will be justified in the following paragraphs, along with a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, to embarking with, several reasons indicate that giving priority to own people is beneficial. First and foremost, the government helps to penurious people and released funds and provides food and shelter additional, in some stimulating situations such as cyclone, earthquake disaster. Secondly, educating more citizens as much as possible also helps the economy in the future and helps reduce delinquency or crime rates.
On the other hand, we are human, and for humanity, we desire to aid others, especially by giving resources. If the authority succours to another part of the world people, it forges tribulation for own country people and the nation, helping other people around the world, forge unemployed in own nation, and a chance to affect the economy. Apart from it, for critical situation help to other countries also make good relations to other countries. For example, developed countries provide help to poor and underdeveloped countries through food and essential resources, especially in an emergency.
To end with, some people think that the authority has to help own nation citizen instead of other countries people. I believe that the authority can succour own people and improve their lifestyle standard, before handle own situation, prioritize outside border people get into trouble, however, sometimes in critical situation helpful is also good for humanity.
It is impossible to help all people IELTS Essay – Model Answer
A fair amount of people believe that as long as there are problems in our own society, we should not help people from other countries. I disagree with this approach because I believe we should strive to help as many people as possible.
To commence with, I recognize that it is crucial to help our neighbors and fellow citizens. Most of the communities have people who are somewhat poor or disadvantaged. For instance, you can find homeless people even in the richest cities, and for those who are concerned about this problem, there is usually an opportunity to donate time or give money to support these people. In India, people can help in a variety of ways, from donating clothing to serving free food in community kitchens. Since problems are on the way and there are obvious ways to help, I can understand why some people feel that we should prioritize local philanthropy.
Moreover, I believe that we have a responsibility to help those who live outside our national borders. The problems people face in some countries are far more serious than those in our own communities, and it is often easier to help. For example, when children in South African countries are dying from curable diseases, governments and individuals in wealthy nations can save lives simply by paying for pre-existing vaccines. A small donation to an international charity can have a far greater impact than helping in our area.
In conclusion, it is true that we can’t assist everybody, but in my opinion, national boundaries should not stop us from helping the needy.